Differential diagnosis and treatment of mioepithelioma and pleomorphic adenoma

Authors

  • Juliana Maria Araújo Silva Universidade Federal da Bahia. Faculdade de Odontologia. Residência em Cirurgia e Traumatologia Bucomaxilofacial
  • Reinilton Gomes Rocha Júnior União Metropolitana de Educação e Cultura, UNIME. Cirurgião-dentista
  • Laís Câncio Hayne União Metropolitana de Educação e Cultura, UNIME. Cirurgião-dentista
  • Juliana Andrade Cardoso União Metropolitana de Educação e Cultura, UNIME. Curso de Odontologia. Núcleo de Propedêuticas. Professora
  • Antônio Varela Câncio Hospital Clériston Andrade. Serviço de Cirurgia e Traumatologia Bucomaxilofacial
  • Jener Gonçalves de Farias União Metropolitana de Educação e Cultura, UNIME. Curso de Odontologia. Núcleo de Propedêuticas. Professora

Keywords:

Salivary Gland Neoplasms, Myoepithelioma, Adenoma, Pleomorphic, Diagnosis, Differential, Mouth/pathology

Abstract

Introduction: The neoplasms of salivary gland constitute a group of lesions clinically and morphologically different, which are able to determine important challenges in diagnostic and therapeutic. To report two cases of benign tumors of the minor salivary glands, adenoma and myoepithelioma. Also, discussing the differential diagnosis and its treatment in comparison with literature information. Case report: Two female patients, with similar ages, both complained about the appearance of an asymptomatic lesion on the palate after using a poorly adapted prosthesis. On the clinical characteristics of the lesions, the hypothetical diagnosis was of minor salivary gland tumor and pleomorphic adenoma, respectively. In the absence of signs of malignancy, the proposed treatment was excisional biopsy with enucleation and curettage. The histopathology diagnosis was begin tumor of minorsalivary glands (myoepithelioma plasmacytoid), and pleomorphic adenoma, respectively. The enucleation and curettage were effective and there were no signs of recurrence. Final considerations: Both the adenoma and myoepithelioma are clinically similar and the differential diagnosis is performed by the histopathology exam, but conservative treatment such as enucleation and curettage can be applied to both.

Published

2026-07-27

How to Cite

Silva, J. M. A., Rocha Júnior, R. G., Hayne, L. C., Cardoso, J. A., Câncio, A. V., & Farias, J. G. de. (2026). Differential diagnosis and treatment of mioepithelioma and pleomorphic adenoma. Brazilian Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 20(4), 21–25. Retrieved from https://periodicos.upe.br/index.php/rctbmf/article/view/2187

Issue

Section

Clinical article

Most read articles by the same author(s)